WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32 B vs WHITE 2-35
7 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the WT-32 B and the 2-35 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
7 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | WT-32 B | 2-35 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 29.6 hp | 30.6 hp | — |
| Engine declared | INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER BD-144 | ISUZU 3 AB-1 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 2.36 L | 1.78 L | +33% WT-32 B |
| Maximum torque declared | 105 lb·ft · 142 N·m | — | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | Pedal operated dry Fichtel & Sachs single plate clutch type K-16 | Foot-operated two-stage dry single-disc clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Hydraulic centre declared | — | Open centre | — |
| Pump flow declared | — | 6.6 gpm · 25.0 L/min | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 3,968 lb · 1,800 kg | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 3,417 lb · 1,550 kg | 2,690 lb · 1,220 kg | +27% WT-32 B |
| Wheelbase declared | 77.6 in · 1,970 mm | 69.0 in · 1,753 mm | +12% WT-32 B |
| Length declared | 128.3 in · 3,260 mm | 122.0 in · 3,099 mm | — |
| Width declared | 60.2 in · 1,530 mm | 61.0 in · 1,549 mm | — |
| Height declared | 59.8 in · 1,520 mm | 80.0 in · 2,032 mm | +34% 2-35 |
| Ground clearance declared | 15.6 in · 395 mm | 15.0 in · 381 mm | — |
| Turning radius, braked declared | — | 9.0 ft · 2.75 m | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 38.0 qt · 36.0 L | 31.7 qt · 30.0 L | +20% WT-32 B |
WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32 B sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 32B”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick B-250”
WHITE 2-35 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-35”