WhichTractor

WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32 vs Zickler 3754

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32

1968–1970

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

Zickler 3754

1966–1967

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

We will not advise between these two machines, because their unladen weight differs by more than 25% (47%); the drive differs (2WD / 4WD; 2WD); they were not built in overlapping years (1968–1970; 1966–1967). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.

Field by field

9 material differences · 1 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32 and Zickler 3754, field by field
FieldWT-323754Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed29.6 hp30 hp—
Engine declaredINTERNATIONAL HARVESTER BD-144——
Displacement declared2.36 L——
Maximum torque declared105 lb·ft · 142 N·m——
Transmission
Top speed declared18.6 mph · 30 km/h11.7 mph · 18.79 km/h+60% WT-32
Clutch declaredPedal operated dry Fichtel & Sachs single disc clutchSingle-plate dry clutchdiffers
Hydraulics & hitch
Three-point lift at ends declared2,646 lb · 1,200 kg——
Rear PTO speeds declared540 rpm588 rpmdiffers
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared3,395 lb · 1,540 kg2,315 lb · 1,050 kg+47% WT-32
Maximum permissible mass declared—3,726 lb · 1,690 kg—
Wheelbase declared77.6 in · 1,970 mm54.3 in · 1,380 mm+43% WT-32
Length declared128.3 in · 3,260 mm——
Width declared60.2 in · 1,530 mm36.2 in · 920 mm+66% WT-32
Height declared59.8 in · 1,520 mm41.3 in · 1,050 mm+45% WT-32
Ground clearance declared15.6 in · 395 mm9.1 in · 230 mm+72% WT-32
Turning radius, braked declared7.9 ft · 2.40 m6.4 ft · 1.95 m+23% WT-32
Fuel tank declared38.0 qt · 36.0 L——

WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 32”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick B-250”

Zickler 3754 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Zickler 3754”