WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32 vs Warchalowski WT-30

6 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1968–1970

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1965–1968

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the WT-32 and the WT-30 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

6 material differences · 9 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32 and Warchalowski WT-30, field by field
Field	WT-32	WT-30	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	29.6 hp	29.6 hp	—
Engine declared	INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER BD-144	WARCHALOWSKI E-212	differs
Displacement declared	2.36 L	1.73 L	+36% WT-32
Maximum torque declared	105 lb·ft · 142 N·m	—	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	—
Clutch declared	Pedal operated dry Fichtel & Sachs single disc clutch	pedal-operated dry Fichtel & Sachs single-plate clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Three-point lift at ends declared	2,646 lb · 1,200 kg	2,646 lb · 1,200 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	540 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	3,395 lb · 1,540 kg	3,086 lb · 1,400 kg	+10% WT-32
Wheelbase declared	77.6 in · 1,970 mm	78.1 in · 1,985 mm	—
Length declared	128.3 in · 3,260 mm	118.1 in · 3,000 mm	+9% WT-32
Width declared	60.2 in · 1,530 mm	62.2 in · 1,580 mm	—
Height declared	59.8 in · 1,520 mm	62.2 in · 1,580 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	15.6 in · 395 mm	17.5 in · 445 mm	+13% WT-30
Turning radius, braked declared	7.9 ft · 2.40 m	7.9 ft · 2.40 m	—
Fuel tank declared	38.0 qt · 36.0 L	38.0 qt · 36.0 L	—

Source

Source