VOLVO-BM-VALMET Volvo 2005 or WHITE 140?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Volvo 2005 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 140 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The VOLVO-BM-VALMET Volvo 2005 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 42% (1,393 kg / 3,071 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Volvo 2005 | 140 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 103 kW (138 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 2005” | 103 kW (138 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 140” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Volvo 2005 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 140 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Volvo 2005 and the 140. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Volvo 2005 and the 140. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 62.6 L/min (16.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 2005” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 140. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,720 kg (10,406 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 2005” | 3,327 kg (7,335 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 140” | AheadThe VOLVO-BM-VALMET Volvo 2005 has 42% more lift (1,393 kg / 3,071 lb) than the WHITE 140 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,335 kg (13,966 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 2005” | 5,625 kg (12,401 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 140” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VOLVO-BM-VALMET Volvo 2005 is 13% heavier (710 kg / 1,565 lb) than the WHITE 140 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Volvo 2005 and the 140. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 14 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 2005” | 18Traktorenlexikon, “White 140” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Volvo 2005 and the 140. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 2005” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 140” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo 2005” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 140” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo 2005” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “White 140” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo 2005” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “White 140” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1985–1987 | 1987–1990 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The VOLVO-BM-VALMET Volvo 2005 has 42% more lift (1,393 kg / 3,071 lb) than the WHITE 140 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The VOLVO-BM-VALMET Volvo 2005 is 13% heavier (710 kg / 1,565 lb) than the WHITE 140 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Volvo 2005 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 140 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources