VALMET 805/805-4 or VOLVO-BM-VALMET Volvo 805?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 805/805-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Volvo 805 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for VALMET 805/805-4 and VOLVO-BM-VALMET Volvo 805, with the call on each
Question805/805-4Volvo 805Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?69.9 kW (93.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 805”69.9 kW (93.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 805”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 805/805-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Volvo 805 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 805/805-4 and the Volvo 805.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 805/805-4 and the Volvo 805.
Which pumps more oil for implements?51.2 L/min (13.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 805”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Volvo 805.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,150 kg (9,149 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 805”4,150 kg (9,149 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 805”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,540 kg (7,804 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 805”3,540 kg (7,804 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 805”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 805/805-4 and the Volvo 805.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 805”8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 805”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 805/805-4 and the Volvo 805.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 805”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 805”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 805”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo 805”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 805”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo 805”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 805”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo 805”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1983–19891983–1986EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 805/805-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Volvo 805 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources