VALMET 6600-4 (6600E) or ZETOR 10641?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 6600-4 (6600E) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10641 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The VALMET 6600-4 (6600E) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 22% (14.3 L/min / 3.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The VALMET 6600-4 (6600E) suits road haulage better on this data: 12% (800 kg / 1,764 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for VALMET 6600-4 (6600E) and ZETOR 10641, with the call on each
Question6600-4 (6600E)10641Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?77.2 kW (103.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6600”77.2 kW (103.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6600-4 (6600E) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10641 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 6600-4 (6600E) and the 10641.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 6600-4 (6600E) and the 10641.
Which pumps more oil for implements?80.3 L/min (21.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6600”66.0 L/min (17.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)”AheadThe VALMET 6600-4 (6600E) has 22% more hydraulic flow (14.3 L/min / 3.8 gpm) than the ZETOR 10641 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?5,865 kg (12,930 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6600”5,782 kg (12,747 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,400 kg (9,700 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6600”4,075 kg (8,984 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6600”6,700 kg (14,771 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)”AheadThe VALMET 6600-4 (6600E) has 12% higher maximum permissible mass (800 kg / 1,764 lb) than the ZETOR 10641 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6600”24Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 6600-4 (6600E) and the 10641.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6600”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6600”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6600”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6600”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1991–20001999–2002Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 10641 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The VALMET 6600-4 (6600E) has 22% more hydraulic flow (14.3 L/min / 3.8 gpm) than the ZETOR 10641 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 6600-4 (6600E) has 12% higher maximum permissible mass (800 kg / 1,764 lb) than the ZETOR 10641 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The ZETOR 10641 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6600-4 (6600E) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10641 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources