VALMET 505/505-4 or ZETOR 6321/6341 Super?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the VALMET 505/505-4: three-point lift.

  • The VALMET 505/505-4 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 26% (815 kg / 1,797 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for VALMET 505/505-4 and ZETOR 6321/6341 Super, with the call on each
Question505/505-46321/6341 SuperCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?45.0 kW (60.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 505”45.2 kW (60.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6321/6341”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 505/505-4 and the 6321/6341 Super.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 505/505-4 and the 6321/6341 Super.
Which pumps more oil for implements?45.0 L/min (11.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6321/6341”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 505/505-4.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,946 kg (8,699 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 505”3,131 kg (6,903 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6321/6341”AheadThe VALMET 505/505-4 has 26% more lift (815 kg / 1,797 lb) than the ZETOR 6321/6341 Super (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,520 kg (7,760 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 505”3,125 kg (6,889 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6321/6341”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 505/505-4 is 13% heavier (395 kg / 871 lb) than the ZETOR 6321/6341 Super (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,400 kg (11,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6321/6341”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 505/505-4.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 505”10 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6321/6341”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 505/505-4 and the 6321/6341 Super.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 505”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6321/6341”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 505”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6321/6341”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 505”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6321/6341”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 505”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6321/6341”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1983–19891997–2004Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 6321/6341 Super is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The VALMET 505/505-4 has 26% more lift (815 kg / 1,797 lb) than the ZETOR 6321/6341 Super (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 505/505-4 is 13% heavier (395 kg / 871 lb) than the ZETOR 6321/6341 Super (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The ZETOR 6321/6341 Super is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources