VALMET 502 vs ZETOR 5211/5245
11 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 502 and the 5211/5245 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
11 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 502 | 5211/5245 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 48 hp | 46.4 hp | — |
| Engine declared | VALMET 310 B | ZBROJORKA Z-5201 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 2.69 L | 2.70 L | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 126 lb·ft · 171 N·m | 108 lb·ft · 146 N·m | +17% 502 |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | 15.5 mph · 25 km/h | +20% 502 |
| Clutch declared | Dry BORG & BECK double clutch | dry double clutch, pedal-operated driving clutch and hand lever-operated PTO clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 8.2 gpm · 30.9 L/min | 15.6 gpm · 59.0 L/min | +91% 5211/5245 |
| Pressure declared | — | 1,160 psi · 80 bar | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 3,748 lb · 1,700 kg | 3,858 lb · 1,750 kg | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540/1000 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 5,637 lb · 2,557 kg | 6,283 lb · 2,850 kg | +11% 5211/5245 |
| Wheelbase declared | 83.1 in · 2,112 mm | 83.6 in · 2,123 mm | — |
| Length declared | 139.7 in · 3,548 mm | 142.5 in · 3,620 mm | — |
| Width declared | 74.2 in · 1,885 mm | 72.8 in · 1,850 mm | — |
| Height declared | 94.5 in · 2,400 mm | 102.4 in · 2,600 mm | +8% 5211/5245 |
| Ground clearance declared | 22.0 in · 560 mm | 16.3 in · 415 mm | +35% 502 |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 11.5 ft · 3.51 m | 10.9 ft · 3.32 m | +6% 502 |
| Fuel tank declared | 68.7 qt · 65.0 L | 58.1 qt · 55.0 L | +18% 502 |
VALMET 502 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 502”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 500”
ZETOR 5211/5245 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5211”