VALMET 4100 or VOLVO-BM-VALMET 305 (305/4)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 4100 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 305 (305/4) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The VALMET 4100 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 59% (1,060 kg / 2,337 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for VALMET 4100 and VOLVO-BM-VALMET 305 (305/4), with the call on each
Question4100305 (305/4)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?39 kW (52 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4100”39 kW (52 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 305”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 4100 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 305 (305/4) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 4100 and the 305 (305/4).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 4100 and the 305 (305/4).
Which pumps more oil for implements?39.0 L/min (10.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4100”35.6 L/min (9.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 305”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,855 kg (6,294 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4100”1,795 kg (3,957 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 305”AheadThe VALMET 4100 has 59% more lift (1,060 kg / 2,337 lb) than the VOLVO-BM-VALMET 305 (305/4) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,660 kg (5,864 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4100”2,710 kg (5,975 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 305”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 4100 and the 305 (305/4).
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4100”8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 305”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 4100 and the 305 (305/4).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4100”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 305”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540E/540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4100”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo 305”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4100”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo 305”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 4100”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo 305”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1993–19961985Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 4100 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The VALMET 4100 has 59% more lift (1,060 kg / 2,337 lb) than the VOLVO-BM-VALMET 305 (305/4) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 4100 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 4100 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 305 (305/4) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources