UTB U-510 or WHITE 2-50?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the U-510 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-50 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The WHITE 2-50 suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
- The WHITE 2-50 suits road haulage better on this data: 30% (7.0 km/h / 4.3 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | U-510 | 2-50 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 35.3 kW (47.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 510” | 35.3 kW (47.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-50” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the U-510 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-50 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the U-510 and the 2-50. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the U-510 and the 2-50. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 22.7 L/min (6.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-50” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the U-510. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,650 kg (3,638 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 510” | 952 kg (2,099 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-50” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the U-510: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 510”); the 2-50: lift through the full range 610 mm behind the ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-50”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,943 kg (4,284 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 510” | 1,859 kg (4,098 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-50” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the U-510 and the 2-50. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 510” | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-50” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the U-510 and the 2-50. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 23 km/h (14.3 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 510” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-50” | AheadThe WHITE 2-50 has 30% more top speed (7.0 km/h / 4.3 mph) than the UTB U-510 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 510” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-50” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-50” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the U-510. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 510” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-50” | AheadThe WHITE 2-50 is available with four-wheel drive; the UTB U-510 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1979–1990 | 1976–1980 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The WHITE 2-50 has 30% more top speed (7.0 km/h / 4.3 mph) than the UTB U-510 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The WHITE 2-50 is available with four-wheel drive; the UTB U-510 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the U-510 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-50 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the U-510: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 510”); the 2-50: lift through the full range 610 mm behind the ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-50”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources