UTB U-453 DT or WHITE 43?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the U-453 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 43 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for UTB U-453 DT and WHITE 43, with the call on each
QuestionU-453 DT43Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?33.1 kW (44.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 453 DT”33.5 kW (44.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 43”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the U-453 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 43 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the U-453 DT and the 43.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the U-453 DT and the 43.
Which pumps more oil for implements?34.0 L/min (9.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 453 DT”31.8 L/min (8.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “White 43”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,630 kg (3,594 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 453 DT”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 43.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,900 kg (6,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 453 DT”1,700 kg (3,748 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 43”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The UTB U-453 DT is 71% heavier (1,200 kg / 2,646 lb) than the WHITE 43 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the U-453 DT and the 43.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 453 DT”12Traktorenlexikon, “White 43”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 453 DT”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 43.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 453 DT”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 43”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 453 DT”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 43”AheadThe UTB U-453 DT offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the WHITE 43 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “White 43”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the U-453 DT.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 453 DT”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “White 43”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1988–20041986–1988EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The UTB U-453 DT is 71% heavier (1,200 kg / 2,646 lb) than the WHITE 43 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The UTB U-453 DT offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the WHITE 43 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the U-453 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 43 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources