UTB U-300 vs WHITE 2-32

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1980–1991

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1984–1986

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the U-300 and the 2-32 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

UTB U-300 and WHITE 2-32, field by field
Field	U-300	2-32	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	26.7 hp	27.6 hp	—
Engine declared	UTB D-111.001	ISUZU 4 FA 1	differs
Displacement declared	1.56 L	1.49 L	—
Maximum torque declared	57 lb·ft · 77 N·m	—	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	13.7 mph · 22 km/h	+14% U-300
Clutch declared	pedal-operated dry two-stage double clutch	—	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	—	Open centre	—
Pump flow declared	5.8 gpm · 21.8 L/min	—	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	2,712 lb · 1,230 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	540 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	3,508 lb · 1,591 kg	2,915 lb · 1,322 kg	+20% U-300
Wheelbase declared	71.1 in · 1,805 mm	70.9 in · 1,801 mm	—
Length declared	110.4 in · 2,805 mm	126.1 in · 3,203 mm	+14% 2-32
Width declared	62.0 in · 1,575 mm	71.5 in · 1,816 mm	+15% 2-32
Height declared	58.7 in · 1,490 mm	78.8 in · 2,002 mm	+34% 2-32
Ground clearance declared	18.3 in · 465 mm	14.2 in · 361 mm	+29% U-300
Turning radius, braked declared	7.7 ft · 2.35 m	8.4 ft · 2.57 m	+9% 2-32
Fuel tank declared	57.1 qt · 54.0 L	42.3 qt · 40.0 L	+35% U-300

Source

Source