UTB 302 Dtce-IF or WHITE 2-32?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 302 Dtce-IF has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-32 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The UTB 302 Dtce-IF suits road haulage better on this data: 14% (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 302 Dtce-IF | 2-32 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 22.1 kW (29.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 302 DTCE IF” | 20.6 kW (27.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-32” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 302 Dtce-IF has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-32 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 302 Dtce-IF and the 2-32. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 302 Dtce-IF and the 2-32. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 25.0 L/min (6.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 302 DTCE IF” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 2-32. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,200 kg (2,646 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 302 DTCE IF” | 1,230 kg (2,712 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-32” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,775 kg (6,118 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 302 DTCE IF” | 1,322 kg (2,915 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-32” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The UTB 302 Dtce-IF is 110% heavier (1,453 kg / 3,203 lb) than the WHITE 2-32 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 302 Dtce-IF and the 2-32. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 6Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 302 DTCE IF” | 18Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-32” | AheadThe WHITE 2-32 has 200% more forward gears (12 gears) than the UTB 302 Dtce-IF (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-32” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 302 Dtce-IF. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 302 DTCE IF” | 22 km/h (13.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-32” | AheadThe UTB 302 Dtce-IF has 14% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the WHITE 2-32 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 302 DTCE IF” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-32” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 302 Dtce-IF and the 2-32. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 302 DTCE IF” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-32” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1980–1991 | 1984–1986 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The UTB 302 Dtce-IF is 110% heavier (1,453 kg / 3,203 lb) than the WHITE 2-32 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The WHITE 2-32 has 200% more forward gears (12 gears) than the UTB 302 Dtce-IF (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The UTB 302 Dtce-IF has 14% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the WHITE 2-32 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 302 Dtce-IF has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-32 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources