URSUS C-350 or Volvo T 430 (Volvo)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Volvo T 430: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on top speed and PTO speeds.
- The Volvo T 430 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
- The Volvo T 430 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 65% (13.0 L/min / 3.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Volvo T 430 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | C-350 | T 430 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 32.4 kW (43.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus C-350” | 32.2 kW (43.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 430 Buster” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the C-350 and the T 430. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the C-350 and the T 430. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 20.0 L/min (5.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus C-350” | 33.0 L/min (8.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 430 Buster” | AheadThe Volvo T 430 has 65% more hydraulic flow (13.0 L/min / 3.4 gpm) than the URSUS C-350 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,200 kg (2,646 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus C-350” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the T 430. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,146 kg (4,731 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus C-350” | 2,398 kg (5,287 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 430 Buster” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Volvo T 430 is 12% heavier (252 kg / 556 lb) than the URSUS C-350 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the C-350 and the T 430. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 10Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus C-350” | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 430 Buster” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the C-350 and the T 430. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus C-350” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 430 Buster” | AheadThe Volvo T 430 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the URSUS C-350 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus C-350” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 430 Buster” | AheadThe Volvo T 430 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the URSUS C-350 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the C-350 and the T 430. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus C-350” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 430 Buster” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1965–1970 | 1969–1978 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Volvo T 430 has 65% more hydraulic flow (13.0 L/min / 3.4 gpm) than the URSUS C-350 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Volvo T 430 is 12% heavier (252 kg / 556 lb) than the URSUS C-350 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Volvo T 430 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the URSUS C-350 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Volvo T 430 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the URSUS C-350 does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources