URSUS 6012/6014 or WHITE 80?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 6012/6014 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 80 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 6012/6014 | 80 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 60.3 kW (80.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 6012/6014” | 60.3 kW (80.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 80” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6012/6014 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 80 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 6012/6014 and the 80. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 6012/6014 and the 80. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 61.3 L/min (16.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 6012/6014” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 80. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,781 kg (8,336 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 6012/6014” | 2,277 kg (5,020 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 80” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 6012/6014: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 6012/6014”); the 80: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 80”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,340 kg (7,363 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 6012/6014” | 3,243 kg (7,150 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 80” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 6012/6014 and the 80. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 6012/6014” | 6 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “White 80” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 6012/6014 and the 80. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 6012/6014” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 80” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 6012/6014” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 80” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 6012/6014” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “White 80” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 6012/6014” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “White 80” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1997–2009 | 1989–1991 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The URSUS 6012/6014 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The URSUS 6012/6014 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6012/6014 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 80 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 6012/6014: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 6012/6014”); the 80: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 80”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources