URSUS 5714 or ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 5714 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8641 (2002-2007) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 144% (3,335 kg / 7,352 lb) more three-point lift.
- The ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 5714 | 8641 (2002-2007) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 58.1 kW (77.9 hp)Wikipedia (pl): Ursus 5714 (open data) | 58.8 kW (78.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8641 (2002-2007)” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 5714 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8641 (2002-2007) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 5714 and the 8641 (2002-2007). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 5714 and the 8641 (2002-2007). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 58.0 L/min (15.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5714” | 57.0 L/min (15.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8641 (2002-2007)” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,315 kg (5,104 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5714” | 5,650 kg (12,456 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8641 (2002-2007)” | AheadThe ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) has 144% more lift (3,335 kg / 7,352 lb) than the URSUS 5714 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,555 kg (7,837 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5714” | 4,255 kg (9,381 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8641 (2002-2007)” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) is 20% heavier (700 kg / 1,543 lb) than the URSUS 5714 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 6,700 kg (14,771 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8641 (2002-2007)” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 5714. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5714” | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8641 (2002-2007)” | Sources disagreeNo call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the 5714. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 5714 and the 8641 (2002-2007). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5714” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8641 (2002-2007)” | AheadThe ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the URSUS 5714 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5714” | 540/750/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8641 (2002-2007)” | AheadThe ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the URSUS 5714 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5714” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8641 (2002-2007)” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5714”; OECD test report 1881, 2000; OECD test report 1882, 2000 | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8641 (2002-2007)” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2002–2009 | 2002–2007 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) has 144% more lift (3,335 kg / 7,352 lb) than the URSUS 5714 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) is 20% heavier (700 kg / 1,543 lb) than the URSUS 5714 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the URSUS 5714 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007) offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the URSUS 5714 does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 5714 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8641 (2002-2007) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the 5714.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources