URSUS 5714 or VALMET 6100-4?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 5714 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6100-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The VALMET 6100-4 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 38% (22.3 L/min / 5.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 88% (2,040 kg / 4,497 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for URSUS 5714 and VALMET 6100-4, with the call on each
Question57146100-4Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?58.1 kW (77.9 hp)Wikipedia (pl): Ursus 5714 (open data)58.1 kW (77.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6100”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 5714 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6100-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 5714 and the 6100-4.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 5714 and the 6100-4.
Which pumps more oil for implements?58.0 L/min (15.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5714”80.3 L/min (21.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6100”AheadThe VALMET 6100-4 has 38% more hydraulic flow (22.3 L/min / 5.9 gpm) than the URSUS 5714 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,315 kg (5,104 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5714”4,355 kg (9,601 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6100”AheadThe VALMET 6100-4 has 88% more lift (2,040 kg / 4,497 lb) than the URSUS 5714 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,555 kg (7,837 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5714”4,000 kg (8,818 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6100”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 6100-4 is 13% heavier (445 kg / 981 lb) than the URSUS 5714 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?—6,300 kg (13,889 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6100”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 5714.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5714”12 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6100”Sources disagreeNo call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the 5714.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 5714 and the 6100-4.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5714”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6100”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5714”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6100”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5714”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 6100-4.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5714”; OECD test report 1881, 2000; OECD test report 1882, 20004WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6100”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2002–20091991–1994Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The URSUS 5714 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The VALMET 6100-4 has 38% more hydraulic flow (22.3 L/min / 5.9 gpm) than the URSUS 5714 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 6100-4 has 88% more lift (2,040 kg / 4,497 lb) than the URSUS 5714 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 6100-4 is 13% heavier (445 kg / 981 lb) than the URSUS 5714 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The URSUS 5714 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 5714 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6100-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the 5714.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources