URSUS 3512 or ZETOR 5211/5245?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 3512 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5211/5245 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The ZETOR 5211/5245 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 184% (38.2 L/min / 10.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 22% (312 kg / 688 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 3512 | 5211/5245 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 34.6 kW (46.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 3512” | 34.6 kW (46.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5211” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 3512 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5211/5245 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 3512 and the 5211/5245. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 3512 and the 5211/5245. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 20.8 L/min (5.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 3512” | 59.0 L/min (15.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5211” | AheadThe ZETOR 5211/5245 has 184% more hydraulic flow (38.2 L/min / 10.1 gpm) than the URSUS 3512 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,438 kg (3,170 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 3512” | 1,750 kg (3,858 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5211” | AheadThe ZETOR 5211/5245 has 22% more lift (312 kg / 688 lb) than the URSUS 3512 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,230 kg (4,916 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 3512” | 2,850 kg (6,283 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5211” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 5211/5245 is 28% heavier (620 kg / 1,367 lb) than the URSUS 3512 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 3512 and the 5211/5245. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 3512” | 10Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5211” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 3512 and the 5211/5245. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 3512” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5211” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 3512” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5211” | AheadThe ZETOR 5211/5245 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the URSUS 3512 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 3512 and the 5211/5245. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 3512” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5211” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1988–2009 | 1984–1993 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The ZETOR 5211/5245 has 184% more hydraulic flow (38.2 L/min / 10.1 gpm) than the URSUS 3512 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 5211/5245 has 22% more lift (312 kg / 688 lb) than the URSUS 3512 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 5211/5245 is 28% heavier (620 kg / 1,367 lb) than the URSUS 3512 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 5211/5245 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the URSUS 3512 does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 3512 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5211/5245 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources