URSUS 1.201 / 1.204 or WHITE 2-110?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 1.201 / 1.204 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-110 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The WHITE 2-110 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 1.201 / 1.204 | 2-110 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 89 kW (119 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1201/1204” | 89.7 kW (120.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-110” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 1.201 / 1.204 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-110 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1.201 / 1.204 and the 2-110. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1.201 / 1.204 and the 2-110. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 1.201 / 1.204 and the 2-110. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,916 kg (10,838 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1201/1204” | 2,722 kg (6,001 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-110” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 1.201 / 1.204: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1201/1204”); the 2-110: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-110”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,238 kg (9,343 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1201/1204” | 5,530 kg (12,192 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-110” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The WHITE 2-110 is 30% heavier (1,292 kg / 2,848 lb) than the URSUS 1.201 / 1.204 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1.201 / 1.204 and the 2-110. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1201/1204” | 18Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-110” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1.201 / 1.204 and the 2-110. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1201/1204” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-110” | AheadThe WHITE 2-110 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the URSUS 1.201 / 1.204 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1201/1204” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-110” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-110” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1.201 / 1.204. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1201/1204” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-110” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1974–1993 | 1982–1987 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The WHITE 2-110 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The WHITE 2-110 is 30% heavier (1,292 kg / 2,848 lb) than the URSUS 1.201 / 1.204 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The WHITE 2-110 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the URSUS 1.201 / 1.204 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The WHITE 2-110 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 1.201 / 1.204 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-110 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 1.201 / 1.204: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1201/1204”); the 2-110: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-110”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources