Steyr 870 (a) or URSUS C-385 (Ursus)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Steyr 870 (a): hydraulic flow and three-point lift.

  • The Steyr 870 (a) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 16% (5.0 L/min / 1.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 23% (550 kg / 1,213 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Steyr 870 (a) and URSUS C-385 (Ursus), with the call on each
Question870 (a)C-385Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?49.3 kW (66.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 870”49.4 kW (66.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus C-385”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 870 (a) and the C-385.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 870 (a) and the C-385.
Which pumps more oil for implements?37.0 L/min (9.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 870”32.0 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus C-385”AheadThe Steyr 870 (a) has 16% more hydraulic flow (5.0 L/min / 1.3 gpm) than the URSUS C-385 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,900 kg (6,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 870”2,350 kg (5,181 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus C-385”AheadThe Steyr 870 (a) has 23% more lift (550 kg / 1,213 lb) than the URSUS C-385 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,930 kg (6,460 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 870”3,525 kg (7,771 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus C-385”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The URSUS C-385 is 20% heavier (595 kg / 1,312 lb) than the Steyr 870 (a) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 870 (a) and the C-385.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 870”16Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus C-385”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 870 (a) and the C-385.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 870”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus C-385”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 870”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus C-385”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?liveTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 870”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the C-385.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 870”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus C-385”; Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus C-385A”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1971–19751969–1983EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Steyr 870 (a) has 16% more hydraulic flow (5.0 L/min / 1.3 gpm) than the URSUS C-385 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Steyr 870 (a) has 23% more lift (550 kg / 1,213 lb) than the URSUS C-385 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The URSUS C-385 is 20% heavier (595 kg / 1,312 lb) than the Steyr 870 (a) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources