Steyr 8140 (a) or VALMET 8100?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 8140 (a) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8100 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The VALMET 8100 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 65% (26.5 L/min / 7.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Steyr 8140 (a) and VALMET 8100, with the call on each
Question8140 (a)8100Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?88.3 kW (118.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8140”88.3 kW (118.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8100”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8140 (a) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8100 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 8140 (a) and the 8100.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 8140 (a) and the 8100.
Which pumps more oil for implements?40.9 L/min (10.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8140”67.4 L/min (17.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8100”AheadThe VALMET 8100 has 65% more hydraulic flow (26.5 L/min / 7.0 gpm) than the Steyr 8140 (a) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,200 kg (4,850 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8140”—No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 8100.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,650 kg (10,251 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8140”4,600 kg (10,141 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8100”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?—7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8100”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 8140 (a).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8140”12 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8100”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 8140 (a) and the 8100.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8140”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8100”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8140”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8100”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8140”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8100”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8140”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8100”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1977–19821990–1996Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 8100 is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The VALMET 8100 has 65% more hydraulic flow (26.5 L/min / 7.0 gpm) than the Steyr 8140 (a) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 8100 is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8140 (a) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8100 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources