Steyr 288 or ZETOR 4911?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Steyr 288: hydraulic flow and three-point lift. It is also ahead on top speed.

  • The Steyr 288 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 29% (7.2 L/min / 1.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 34% (405 kg / 893 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Steyr 288 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Steyr 288 and ZETOR 4911, with the call on each
Question2884911Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?29.4 kW (39 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 288”29.1 kW (39.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 4911”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 288 and the 4911.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 288 and the 4911.
Which pumps more oil for implements?32.0 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 288”24.8 L/min (6.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 4911”AheadThe Steyr 288 has 29% more hydraulic flow (7.2 L/min / 1.9 gpm) than the ZETOR 4911 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,600 kg (3,527 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 288”1,195 kg (2,635 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 4911”AheadThe Steyr 288 has 34% more lift (405 kg / 893 lb) than the ZETOR 4911 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?1,930 kg (4,255 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 288”2,170 kg (4,784 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 4911”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 4911 is 12% heavier (240 kg / 529 lb) than the Steyr 288 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 288 and the 4911.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 288”10Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 4911”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 288 and the 4911.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 288”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 4911”AheadThe Steyr 288 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the ZETOR 4911 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 288”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 4911”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 288 and the 4911.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 288”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 4911”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1962–19661977–1980Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 4911 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Steyr 288 has 29% more hydraulic flow (7.2 L/min / 1.9 gpm) than the ZETOR 4911 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Steyr 288 has 34% more lift (405 kg / 893 lb) than the ZETOR 4911 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The ZETOR 4911 is 12% heavier (240 kg / 529 lb) than the Steyr 288 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Steyr 288 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the ZETOR 4911 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The ZETOR 4911 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources