Steyr 185 a or VOLVO-BM T 600 Boxer?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the VOLVO-BM T 600 Boxer: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on top speed.

  • The VOLVO-BM T 600 Boxer suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 189% (26.5 L/min / 7.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The VOLVO-BM T 600 Boxer suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Steyr 185 a and VOLVO-BM T 600 Boxer, with the call on each
Question185 aT 600 BoxerCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?35.8 kW (48.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 185a”36.2 kW (48.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 600 Boxer”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 185 a and the T 600 Boxer.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 185 a and the T 600 Boxer.
Which pumps more oil for implements?14.0 L/min (3.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 185a”40.5 L/min (10.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 600 Boxer”AheadThe VOLVO-BM T 600 Boxer has 189% more hydraulic flow (26.5 L/min / 7.0 gpm) than the Steyr 185 a (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,100 kg (2,425 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 185a”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the T 600 Boxer.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,800 kg (6,173 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 185a”3,020 kg (6,658 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 600 Boxer”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 185 a and the T 600 Boxer.
Which has the wider choice of gears?6 to 9Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 185a”10Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 600 Boxer”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 185a”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the T 600 Boxer.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 185a”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 600 Boxer”AheadThe VOLVO-BM T 600 Boxer has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Steyr 185 a (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 185a”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 600 Boxer”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 185 a and the T 600 Boxer.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 185a”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 600 Boxer”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1958–19671967–1970Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VOLVO-BM T 600 Boxer is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The VOLVO-BM T 600 Boxer has 189% more hydraulic flow (26.5 L/min / 7.0 gpm) than the Steyr 185 a (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The VOLVO-BM T 600 Boxer has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Steyr 185 a (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The VOLVO-BM T 600 Boxer is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources