Steyr 1100 (a) or ZETOR 10111/10145?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 1100 (a) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10111/10145 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The ZETOR 10111/10145 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 30% (10.7 L/min / 2.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 1100 (a) | 10111/10145 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 72.1 kW (96.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 1100” | 73.5 kW (98.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10111/10145” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 1100 (a) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10111/10145 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1100 (a) and the 10111/10145. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1100 (a) and the 10111/10145. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 35.5 L/min (9.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 1100” | 46.2 L/min (12.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10111/10145” | AheadThe ZETOR 10111/10145 has 30% more hydraulic flow (10.7 L/min / 2.8 gpm) than the Steyr 1100 (a) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,800 kg (6,173 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 1100” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 10111/10145. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,340 kg (7,363 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 1100” | 4,270 kg (9,414 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10111/10145” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 10111/10145 is 28% heavier (930 kg / 2,050 lb) than the Steyr 1100 (a) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1100 (a) and the 10111/10145. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 1100” | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10111/10145” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1100 (a) and the 10111/10145. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 1100” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10111/10145” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 1100” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10111/10145” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 1100” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 10111/10145. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 1100” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10111/10145” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1971–1977 | 1984–1990 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 10111/10145 is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The ZETOR 10111/10145 has 30% more hydraulic flow (10.7 L/min / 2.8 gpm) than the Steyr 1100 (a) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 10111/10145 is 28% heavier (930 kg / 2,050 lb) than the Steyr 1100 (a) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 10111/10145 is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 1100 (a) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10111/10145 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources