SOMECA SOM-411 or SOMECA SOM-441?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the SOM-411 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the SOM-441 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The SOMECA SOM-441 suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 12% (195 kg / 430 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for SOMECA SOM-411 and SOMECA SOM-441, with the call on each
QuestionSOM-411SOM-441Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?30.2 kW (40.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca SOM 411”30.2 kW (40.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca SOM 441”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the SOM-411 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the SOM-441 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the SOM-411 and the SOM-441.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the SOM-411 and the SOM-441.
Which pumps more oil for implements?16.5 L/min (4.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca SOM 411”16.5 L/min (4.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca SOM 441”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the SOM-411 and the SOM-441.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,575 kg (3,472 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca SOM 411”1,770 kg (3,902 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca SOM 441”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The SOMECA SOM-441 is 12% heavier (195 kg / 430 lb) than the SOMECA SOM-411 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the SOM-411 and the SOM-441.
Which has the wider choice of gears?6Traktorenlexikon, “Someca SOM 411”6Traktorenlexikon, “Someca SOM 441”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the SOM-411 and the SOM-441.
Which is faster on the road?23 km/h (14.3 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca SOM 411”23 km/h (14.3 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca SOM 441”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Someca SOM 411”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Someca SOM 441”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the SOM-411 and the SOM-441.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Someca SOM 411”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Someca SOM 441”AheadThe SOMECA SOM-441 is available with four-wheel drive; the SOMECA SOM-411 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1964–19651964–1965EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The SOMECA SOM-441 is 12% heavier (195 kg / 430 lb) than the SOMECA SOM-411 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The SOMECA SOM-441 is available with four-wheel drive; the SOMECA SOM-411 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the SOM-411 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the SOM-441 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources