SOMECA 650 (TD) or ZETOR 6711?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 650 (TD) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6711 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The SOMECA 650 (TD) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 44% (8.8 L/min / 2.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for SOMECA 650 (TD) and ZETOR 6711, with the call on each
Question650 (TD)6711Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?47.8 kW (64.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 650”47.8 kW (64.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6711”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 650 (TD) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6711 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 650 (TD) and the 6711.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 650 (TD) and the 6711.
Which pumps more oil for implements?28.8 L/min (7.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 650”20.0 L/min (5.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6711”AheadThe SOMECA 650 (TD) has 44% more hydraulic flow (8.8 L/min / 2.3 gpm) than the ZETOR 6711 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,080 kg (4,586 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 650”—No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 6711.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,875 kg (6,338 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 650”2,620 kg (5,776 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6711”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 650 (TD) and the 6711.
Which has the wider choice of gears?7 to 14Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 650”10 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6711”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 650 (TD) and the 6711.
Which is faster on the road?24 km/h (14.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 650”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6711”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 650”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6711”AheadThe SOMECA 650 (TD) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the ZETOR 6711 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 650”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 6711.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 650”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6711”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1971–19761972–1977EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The SOMECA 650 (TD) has 44% more hydraulic flow (8.8 L/min / 2.3 gpm) than the ZETOR 6711 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The SOMECA 650 (TD) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the ZETOR 6711 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 650 (TD) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6711 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources