SOMECA 1300 Super (DT) or WHITE 2-150?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 1300 Super (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The WHITE 2-150 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 66% (30.2 L/min / 8.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The WHITE 2-150 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for SOMECA 1300 Super (DT) and WHITE 2-150, with the call on each
Question1300 Super (DT)2-150Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?106.6 kW (143.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 1300 S”108.1 kW (145.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 1300 Super (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1300 Super (DT) and the 2-150.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1300 Super (DT) and the 2-150.
Which pumps more oil for implements?45.5 L/min (12.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 1300 S”75.7 L/min (20.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”AheadThe WHITE 2-150 has 66% more hydraulic flow (30.2 L/min / 8.0 gpm) than the SOMECA 1300 Super (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,469 kg (9,852 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 1300 S”2,722 kg (6,001 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 1300 Super (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 1300 S”); the 2-150: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,060 kg (11,155 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 1300 S”7,684 kg (16,940 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The WHITE 2-150 is 52% heavier (2,624 kg / 5,785 lb) than the SOMECA 1300 Super (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1300 Super (DT) and the 2-150.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 1300 S”6 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1300 Super (DT) and the 2-150.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 1300 S”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”AheadThe WHITE 2-150 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the SOMECA 1300 Super (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 1300 S”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 1300 S”independentTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 1300 S”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”AheadThe SOMECA 1300 Super (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the WHITE 2-150 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1978–19811974–1976EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The WHITE 2-150 has 66% more hydraulic flow (30.2 L/min / 8.0 gpm) than the SOMECA 1300 Super (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The WHITE 2-150 is 52% heavier (2,624 kg / 5,785 lb) than the SOMECA 1300 Super (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The WHITE 2-150 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the SOMECA 1300 Super (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The SOMECA 1300 Super (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the WHITE 2-150 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 1300 Super (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 1300 Super (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 1300 S”); the 2-150: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-150”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources