Schlüter Compact 1350 TV6/LS or VALMET 8200?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Compact 1350 TV6/LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The VALMET 8200 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 23% (12.5 L/min / 3.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Compact 1350 TV6/LS | 8200 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 95 kW (127 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 1350TV6 / TV6-LS” | 95.6 kW (128.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8200” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Compact 1350 TV6/LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Compact 1350 TV6/LS and the 8200. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Compact 1350 TV6/LS and the 8200. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 54.9 L/min (14.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 1350TV6 / TV6-LS” | 67.4 L/min (17.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8200” | AheadThe VALMET 8200 has 23% more hydraulic flow (12.5 L/min / 3.3 gpm) than the Schlüter Compact 1350 TV6/LS (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 6,200 kg (13,669 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 1350TV6 / TV6-LS” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 8200. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,200 kg (11,464 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 1350TV6 / TV6-LS” | 4,700 kg (10,362 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8200” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Schlüter Compact 1350 TV6/LS is 11% heavier (500 kg / 1,102 lb) than the VALMET 8200 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8200” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Compact 1350 TV6/LS. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 1350TV6 / TV6-LS” | 12 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8200” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Compact 1350 TV6/LS and the 8200. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 1350TV6 / TV6-LS” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8200” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 673/1126 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 1350TV6 / TV6-LS” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8200” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the Compact 1350 TV6/LS. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 1350TV6 / TV6-LS” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 8200. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 1350TV6 / TV6-LS” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8200” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1986–1993 | 1993–1996 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 8200 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The VALMET 8200 has 23% more hydraulic flow (12.5 L/min / 3.3 gpm) than the Schlüter Compact 1350 TV6/LS (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Schlüter Compact 1350 TV6/LS is 11% heavier (500 kg / 1,102 lb) than the VALMET 8200 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The VALMET 8200 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Compact 1350 TV6/LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources