SAME Tiger 100 (DT) or Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Tiger 100 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Euro Trac 1000 CVT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 57% (19.9 L/min / 5.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT suits road haulage better on this data: 60% (15.0 km/h / 9.3 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Tiger 100 (DT) | Euro Trac 1000 CVT | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 75 kW (101 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Tiger 100” | 75 kW (101 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Tiger 100 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Euro Trac 1000 CVT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Tiger 100 (DT) and the Euro Trac 1000 CVT. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Tiger 100 (DT) and the Euro Trac 1000 CVT. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 35.0 L/min (9.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Tiger 100” | 54.9 L/min (14.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT” | AheadThe Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT has 57% more hydraulic flow (19.9 L/min / 5.3 gpm) than the SAME Tiger 100 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,940 kg (6,482 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Tiger 100” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Euro Trac 1000 CVT. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,770 kg (8,311 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Tiger 100” | 4,500 kg (9,921 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT is 19% heavier (730 kg / 1,609 lb) than the SAME Tiger 100 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Tiger 100 (DT) and the Euro Trac 1000 CVT. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 24 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Tiger 100” | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT” | DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the SAME Tiger 100 (DT) has 12 to 24 forward gears and the Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT is stepless (CVT) — not called. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Tiger 100 (DT) and the Euro Trac 1000 CVT. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Tiger 100” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT” | AheadThe Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT has 60% more top speed (15.0 km/h / 9.3 mph) than the SAME Tiger 100 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Tiger 100” | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Tiger 100” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Tiger 100” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1977–1980 | 1992 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT has 57% more hydraulic flow (19.9 L/min / 5.3 gpm) than the SAME Tiger 100 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT is 19% heavier (730 kg / 1,609 lb) than the SAME Tiger 100 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT has 60% more top speed (15.0 km/h / 9.3 mph) than the SAME Tiger 100 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Transmissions differ in kind: the SAME Tiger 100 (DT) has 12 to 24 forward gears and the Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT is stepless (CVT) — not called.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Tiger 100 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Euro Trac 1000 CVT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources