SAME Super-Titan or SAME Titan 190?

Which should you choose?

The figures split: the SAME Super-Titan is ahead on hydraulic flow; the SAME Titan 190 is ahead on three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for SAME Super-Titan and SAME Titan 190, with the call on each
QuestionSuper-TitanTitan 190Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?132.9 kW (178.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Super Titan”132.9 kW (178.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 190”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Super-Titan and the Titan 190.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Super-Titan and the Titan 190.
Which pumps more oil for implements?73.0 L/min (19.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Super Titan”61.8 L/min (16.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 190”AheadThe SAME Super-Titan has 18% more hydraulic flow (11.2 L/min / 3.0 gpm) than the SAME Titan 190 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,200 kg (7,055 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Super Titan”8,600 kg (18,960 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 190”AheadThe SAME Titan 190 has 169% more lift (5,400 kg / 11,905 lb) than the SAME Super-Titan (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?6,450 kg (14,220 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Super Titan”6,510 kg (14,352 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 190”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?10,000 kg (22,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Super Titan”10,000 kg (22,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 190”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?27Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Super Titan”27Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 190”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Super-Titan and the Titan 190.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Super Titan”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 190”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Super Titan”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 190”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Super-Titan and the Titan 190.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Super Titan”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 190”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1998–20011992–2001Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The SAME Super-Titan is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The SAME Super-Titan has 18% more hydraulic flow (11.2 L/min / 3.0 gpm) than the SAME Titan 190 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The SAME Titan 190 has 169% more lift (5,400 kg / 11,905 lb) than the SAME Super-Titan (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The SAME Super-Titan is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources