SAME Sirenetta (DT) vs WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32 B

11 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1971–1972

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1968–1971

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Sirenetta (DT) and the WT-32 B → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

11 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

SAME Sirenetta (DT) and WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32 B, field by field
Field	Sirenetta (DT)	WT-32 B	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	29.6 hp	29.6 hp	—
Engine declared	SAME DA 982 L	INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER BD-144	differs
Displacement declared	1.81 L	2.36 L	+30% WT-32 B
Maximum torque declared	—	105 lb·ft · 142 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	+20% WT-32 B
Clutch declared	Pedal-operated dry single-disc clutch	Pedal operated dry Fichtel & Sachs single plate clutch type K-16	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	2.4 gpm · 9.0 L/min	—	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	3,968 lb · 1,800 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	540 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	3,042 lb · 1,380 kg	3,417 lb · 1,550 kg	+12% WT-32 B
Wheelbase declared	67.7 in · 1,720 mm	77.6 in · 1,970 mm	+15% WT-32 B
Length declared	105.5 in · 2,680 mm	128.3 in · 3,260 mm	+22% WT-32 B
Width declared	56.5 in · 1,435 mm	60.2 in · 1,530 mm	+7% WT-32 B
Height declared	85.8 in · 2,180 mm	59.8 in · 1,520 mm	+43% Sirenetta (DT)
Ground clearance declared	13.8 in · 350 mm	15.6 in · 395 mm	+13% WT-32 B
Fuel tank declared	31.7 qt · 30.0 L	38.0 qt · 36.0 L	+20% WT-32 B

Source

Source