SAME Sirenetta (DT) vs WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32

11 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

SAME Sirenetta (DT)

1971–1972

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32

1968–1970

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

We will not advise between these two machines, because they were not built in overlapping years (1971–1972; 1968–1970). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.

Field by field

11 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

SAME Sirenetta (DT) and WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32, field by field
FieldSirenetta (DT)WT-32Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed29.6 hp29.6 hp
Engine declaredSAME DA 982 LINTERNATIONAL HARVESTER BD-144differs
Displacement declared1.81 L2.36 L+30% WT-32
Maximum torque declared105 lb·ft · 142 N·m
Transmission
Top speed declared15.5 mph · 25 km/h18.6 mph · 30 km/h+20% WT-32
Clutch declaredPedal-operated dry single-disc clutchPedal operated dry Fichtel & Sachs single disc clutchdiffers
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared2.4 gpm · 9.0 L/min
Three-point lift at ends declared2,646 lb · 1,200 kg
Rear PTO speeds declared540 rpm540 rpm
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared3,042 lb · 1,380 kg3,395 lb · 1,540 kg+12% WT-32
Wheelbase declared67.7 in · 1,720 mm77.6 in · 1,970 mm+15% WT-32
Length declared105.5 in · 2,680 mm128.3 in · 3,260 mm+22% WT-32
Width declared56.5 in · 1,435 mm60.2 in · 1,530 mm+7% WT-32
Height declared85.8 in · 2,180 mm59.8 in · 1,520 mm+43% Sirenetta (DT)
Ground clearance declared13.8 in · 350 mm15.6 in · 395 mm+13% WT-32
Turning radius, braked declared7.9 ft · 2.40 m
Fuel tank declared31.7 qt · 30.0 L38.0 qt · 36.0 L+20% WT-32

SAME Sirenetta (DT) sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Sirenetta”

WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 32”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick B-250”