SAME Panter (DT) or Steyr 8090 (a)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Steyr 8090 (a): hydraulic flow and three-point lift.

  • The Steyr 8090 (a) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 23% (7.3 L/min / 1.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 57% (1,625 kg / 3,583 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for SAME Panter (DT) and Steyr 8090 (a), with the call on each
QuestionPanter (DT)8090 (a)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?55.8 kW (74.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Panther”55.7 kW (74.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8090”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Panter (DT) and the 8090 (a).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Panter (DT) and the 8090 (a).
Which pumps more oil for implements?31.7 L/min (8.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Panther”39.0 L/min (10.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8090”AheadThe Steyr 8090 (a) has 23% more hydraulic flow (7.3 L/min / 1.9 gpm) than the SAME Panter (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,875 kg (6,338 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Panther”4,500 kg (9,921 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8090”AheadThe Steyr 8090 (a) has 57% more lift (1,625 kg / 3,583 lb) than the SAME Panter (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,190 kg (7,033 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Panther”3,150 kg (6,945 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8090”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Panter (DT) and the 8090 (a).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Panther”16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8090”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Panter (DT) and the 8090 (a).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Panther”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8090”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Panther”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8090”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Panther”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 8090 (a).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Panther”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8090”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1973–19771983–1992Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Steyr 8090 (a) is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Steyr 8090 (a) has 23% more hydraulic flow (7.3 L/min / 1.9 gpm) than the SAME Panter (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Steyr 8090 (a) has 57% more lift (1,625 kg / 3,583 lb) than the SAME Panter (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Steyr 8090 (a) is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources