SAME Explorer 75 (DT) or WHITE 2-75?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Explorer 75 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-75 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The SAME Explorer 75 (DT) suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Explorer 75 (DT) | 2-75 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 55.2 kW (74.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 75” | 55.9 kW (75.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-75” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Explorer 75 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-75 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Explorer 75 (DT) and the 2-75. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Explorer 75 (DT) and the 2-75. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 36.0 L/min (9.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 75” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 2-75. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,450 kg (7,606 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 75” | 2,405 kg (5,302 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-75” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Explorer 75 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 75”); the 2-75: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-75”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 75” | 2,770 kg (6,107 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-75” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Explorer 75 (DT) and the 2-75. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 75” | 16Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-75” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-75” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Explorer 75 (DT). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 75” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-75” | AheadThe SAME Explorer 75 (DT) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the WHITE 2-75 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 75” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-75” | DifferPTO speeds differ: the SAME Explorer 75 (DT) 540 rpm and the WHITE 2-75 1000 rpm — each offers a speed the other does not; which matters depends on the implement. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 75” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-75” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 75” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-75” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1985–1987 | 1982–1988 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The SAME Explorer 75 (DT) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the WHITE 2-75 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- PTO speeds differ: the SAME Explorer 75 (DT) 540 rpm and the WHITE 2-75 1000 rpm — each offers a speed the other does not; which matters depends on the implement.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Explorer 75 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-75 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the Explorer 75 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 75”); the 2-75: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-75”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources