SAME Condor 55 (DT) or UTB U-553 DT?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Condor 55 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the U-553 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The UTB U-553 DT suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 42% (10.0 L/min / 2.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for SAME Condor 55 (DT) and UTB U-553 DT, with the call on each
QuestionCondor 55 (DT)U-553 DTCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?40.5 kW (54.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”40.5 kW (54.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 553 DT”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Condor 55 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the U-553 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Condor 55 (DT) and the U-553 DT.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Condor 55 (DT) and the U-553 DT.
Which pumps more oil for implements?24.0 L/min (6.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”34.0 L/min (9.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 553 DT”AheadThe UTB U-553 DT has 42% more hydraulic flow (10.0 L/min / 2.6 gpm) than the SAME Condor 55 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,580 kg (3,483 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”2,620 kg (5,776 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 553 DT”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Condor 55 (DT): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”); the U-553 DT: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 553 DT”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,980 kg (4,365 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”3,125 kg (6,889 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 553 DT”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The UTB U-553 DT is 58% heavier (1,145 kg / 2,524 lb) than the SAME Condor 55 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Condor 55 (DT) and the U-553 DT.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 14Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”12Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 553 DT”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 553 DT”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Condor 55 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 553 DT”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 553 DT”AheadThe UTB U-553 DT offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the SAME Condor 55 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the U-553 DT.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 553 DT”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1982–19831988–1991Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The UTB U-553 DT is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The UTB U-553 DT has 42% more hydraulic flow (10.0 L/min / 2.6 gpm) than the SAME Condor 55 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The UTB U-553 DT is 58% heavier (1,145 kg / 2,524 lb) than the SAME Condor 55 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The UTB U-553 DT offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the SAME Condor 55 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The UTB U-553 DT is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Condor 55 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the U-553 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the Condor 55 (DT): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”); the U-553 DT: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 553 DT”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources