RÖHR R 35 vs Warchalowski WT-40

10 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1949

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1958–1961

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the R 35 and the WT-40 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

10 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

RÖHR R 35 and Warchalowski WT-40, field by field
Field	R 35	WT-40	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	35.5 hp	35.5 hp	—
Engine declared	MWM KD 215 D	WARCHALOWSKI D-41	differs
Displacement declared	3.53 L	2.04 L	+73% R 35
Transmission
Top speed declared	12.4 mph · 20 km/h	18.0 mph · 29 km/h	+45% WT-40
Clutch declared	Pedal operated dry single plate clutch	Pedal operated two stage dry Fichtel and Sachs double clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	540/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	4,167 lb · 1,890 kg	3,042 lb · 1,380 kg	+37% R 35
Wheelbase declared	76.4 in · 1,940 mm	79.0 in · 2,007 mm	—
Length declared	122.8 in · 3,120 mm	118.1 in · 3,000 mm	—
Width declared	61.0 in · 1,550 mm	63.0 in · 1,600 mm	—
Height declared	66.9 in · 1,700 mm	48.8 in · 1,240 mm	+37% R 35
Ground clearance declared	13.8 in · 350 mm	16.3 in · 415 mm	+19% WT-40
Turning radius, braked declared	9.8 ft · 3.00 m	13.1 ft · 4.00 m	+33% WT-40
Fuel tank declared	31.7 qt · 30.0 L	37.0 qt · 35.0 L	+17% WT-40

Source

Source