Renault Temis 630 or VALMET 8200?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Temis 630 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The VALMET 8200 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 21% (11.8 L/min / 3.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Renault Temis 630 suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (2,500 kg / 5,512 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Temis 630 | 8200 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 94.9 kW (127.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 630X/Z” | 95.6 kW (128.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8200” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Temis 630 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Temis 630 and the 8200. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Temis 630 and the 8200. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 55.6 L/min (14.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 630X/Z” | 67.4 L/min (17.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8200” | AheadThe VALMET 8200 has 21% more hydraulic flow (11.8 L/min / 3.1 gpm) than the Renault Temis 630 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 8,850 kg (19,511 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 630X/Z” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 8200. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,575 kg (12,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 630X/Z” | 4,700 kg (10,362 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8200” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Temis 630 is 19% heavier (875 kg / 1,929 lb) than the VALMET 8200 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 10,000 kg (22,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 630X/Z” | 7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8200” | AheadThe Renault Temis 630 has 33% higher maximum permissible mass (2,500 kg / 5,512 lb) than the VALMET 8200 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 630X/Z” | 12 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8200” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Temis 630 and the 8200. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 630X/Z” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8200” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 630X/Z” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8200” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 630X/Z” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 8200. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 630X/Z”; OECD test report 1983, 2002 | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8200” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1999–2005 | 1993–1996 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Temis 630 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The VALMET 8200 has 21% more hydraulic flow (11.8 L/min / 3.1 gpm) than the Renault Temis 630 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Renault Temis 630 is 19% heavier (875 kg / 1,929 lb) than the VALMET 8200 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Renault Temis 630 has 33% higher maximum permissible mass (2,500 kg / 5,512 lb) than the VALMET 8200 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Renault Temis 630 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Temis 630 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources