Renault Temis 550 or ZETOR 10641 (2007-2009)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Temis 550 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10641 (2007-2009) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The ZETOR 10641 (2007-2009) suits road haulage better on this data: 31% (1,900 kg / 4,189 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Renault Temis 550 and ZETOR 10641 (2007-2009), with the call on each
QuestionTemis 55010641 (2007-2009)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?75.1 kW (100.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X”74.3 kW (99.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2007-2009)”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Temis 550 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10641 (2007-2009) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Temis 550 and the 10641 (2007-2009).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Temis 550 and the 10641 (2007-2009).
Which pumps more oil for implements?55.7 L/min (14.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X”69.6 L/min (18.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2007-2009)”AheadThe ZETOR 10641 (2007-2009) has 25% more hydraulic flow (13.9 L/min / 3.7 gpm) than the Renault Temis 550 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?7,260 kg (16,006 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X”5,850 kg (12,897 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2007-2009)”AheadThe Renault Temis 550 has 24% more lift (1,410 kg / 3,109 lb) than the ZETOR 10641 (2007-2009) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?5,340 kg (11,773 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X”4,660 kg (10,274 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2007-2009)”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Temis 550 is 15% heavier (680 kg / 1,499 lb) than the ZETOR 10641 (2007-2009) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?6,100 kg (13,448 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X”8,000 kg (17,637 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2007-2009)”AheadThe ZETOR 10641 (2007-2009) has 31% higher maximum permissible mass (1,900 kg / 4,189 lb) than the Renault Temis 550 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X”24Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2007-2009)”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Temis 550 and the 10641 (2007-2009).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2007-2009)”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X”540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2007-2009)”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2007-2009)”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Temis 550.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2007-2009)”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2000–20032007–2009Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 10641 (2007-2009) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The ZETOR 10641 (2007-2009) has 25% more hydraulic flow (13.9 L/min / 3.7 gpm) than the Renault Temis 550 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault Temis 550 has 24% more lift (1,410 kg / 3,109 lb) than the ZETOR 10641 (2007-2009) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault Temis 550 is 15% heavier (680 kg / 1,499 lb) than the ZETOR 10641 (2007-2009) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The ZETOR 10641 (2007-2009) has 31% higher maximum permissible mass (1,900 kg / 4,189 lb) than the Renault Temis 550 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The ZETOR 10641 (2007-2009) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Temis 550 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10641 (2007-2009) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources