Renault Super 4-D vs WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32 B

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1965–1968

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1968–1971

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Super 4-D and the WT-32 B → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Renault Super 4-D and WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32 B, field by field
Field	Super 4-D	WT-32 B	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	29.6 hp	29.6 hp	—
Engine declared	Renault 710/30-31	INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER BD-144	differs
Displacement declared	2.04 L	2.36 L	+16% WT-32 B
Maximum torque declared	85 lb·ft · 115 N·m	105 lb·ft · 142 N·m	+23% WT-32 B
Transmission
Top speed declared	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	+20% WT-32 B
Clutch declared	Pedal-operated dry FERODO single-plate clutch, type 10 LF 24	Pedal operated dry Fichtel & Sachs single plate clutch type K-16	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	4.8 gpm · 18.0 L/min	—	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	3,880 lb · 1,760 kg	3,968 lb · 1,800 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	540 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	3,968 lb · 1,800 kg	3,417 lb · 1,550 kg	+16% Super 4-D
Wheelbase declared	73.6 in · 1,870 mm	77.6 in · 1,970 mm	+5% WT-32 B
Length declared	129.1 in · 3,280 mm	128.3 in · 3,260 mm	—
Width declared	99.2 in · 2,520 mm	60.2 in · 1,530 mm	+65% Super 4-D
Height declared	61.8 in · 1,570 mm	59.8 in · 1,520 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	15.0 in · 380 mm	15.6 in · 395 mm	—
Turning radius, braked declared	9.5 ft · 2.90 m	—	—
Fuel tank declared	42.3 qt · 40.0 L	38.0 qt · 36.0 L	+11% Super 4-D

Source

Source