Renault Ceres 65 (A) or UTB U-530 (DTC)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Ceres 65 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the U-530 (DTC) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Renault Ceres 65 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 79% (1,270 kg / 2,800 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Renault Ceres 65 (A) suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (6.0 km/h / 3.7 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Ceres 65 (A) | U-530 (DTC) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 39.7 kW (53.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 65” | 39.7 kW (53.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 530” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Ceres 65 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the U-530 (DTC) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Ceres 65 (A) and the U-530 (DTC). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Ceres 65 (A) and the U-530 (DTC). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 21.8 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 530” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Ceres 65 (A). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,870 kg (6,327 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 65” | 1,600 kg (3,527 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 530” | AheadThe Renault Ceres 65 (A) has 79% more lift (1,270 kg / 2,800 lb) than the UTB U-530 (DTC) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,850 kg (6,283 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 65” | 1,920 kg (4,233 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 530” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Ceres 65 (A) is 48% heavier (930 kg / 2,050 lb) than the UTB U-530 (DTC) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 4,450 kg (9,811 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 65” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the U-530 (DTC). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 9 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 65” | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 530” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 530” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Ceres 65 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 65” | 24 km/h (14.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 530” | AheadThe Renault Ceres 65 (A) has 25% more top speed (6.0 km/h / 3.7 mph) than the UTB U-530 (DTC) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 65” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 530” | AheadThe Renault Ceres 65 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the UTB U-530 (DTC) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Ceres 65 (A) and the U-530 (DTC). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 65” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 530” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1993–1995 | 1982–1985 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Ceres 65 (A) is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault Ceres 65 (A) has 79% more lift (1,270 kg / 2,800 lb) than the UTB U-530 (DTC) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Renault Ceres 65 (A) is 48% heavier (930 kg / 2,050 lb) than the UTB U-530 (DTC) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Renault Ceres 65 (A) has 25% more top speed (6.0 km/h / 3.7 mph) than the UTB U-530 (DTC) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Renault Ceres 65 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the UTB U-530 (DTC) does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Renault Ceres 65 (A) is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Ceres 65 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the U-530 (DTC) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources