Renault Ceres 65/II or ZETOR 6211/6245?
Which should you choose?
On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Renault Ceres 65/II is ahead on top speed.
- The Renault Ceres 65/II suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Ceres 65/II | 6211/6245 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 37.4 kW (50.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 65/II” | 37.5 kW (50.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6211” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Ceres 65/II and the 6211/6245. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Ceres 65/II and the 6211/6245. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 52.3 L/min (13.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 65/II” | 56.9 L/min (15.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6211” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,870 kg (6,327 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 65/II” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 6211/6245. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,860 kg (6,305 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 65/II” | 2,960 kg (6,526 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6211” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 5,100 kg (11,244 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 65/II” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 6211/6245. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 65/II” | 10 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6211” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Ceres 65/II and the 6211/6245. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 65/II” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6211” | AheadThe Renault Ceres 65/II has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the ZETOR 6211/6245 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 65/II” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6211” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 65/II” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6211” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ceres 65/II” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6211” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1994–1998 | 1984–1993 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Ceres 65/II is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault Ceres 65/II has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the ZETOR 6211/6245 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Renault Ceres 65/II is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources