Renault Ares 836 RZ or Schlüter Euro Trac 1900 HM8?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Ares 836 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Euro Trac 1900 HM8 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Ares 836 RZ | Euro Trac 1900 HM8 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 142.8 kW (191.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 836 RZ” | 143 kW (192 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1900 HM 8” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Ares 836 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Euro Trac 1900 HM8 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Ares 836 RZ and the Euro Trac 1900 HM8. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Ares 836 RZ and the Euro Trac 1900 HM8. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 54.9 L/min (14.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1900 HM 8” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Ares 836 RZ. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 11,560 kg (25,485 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 836 RZ” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Euro Trac 1900 HM8. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 8,150 kg (17,968 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 836 RZ” | 7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1900 HM 8” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Ares 836 RZ is 16% heavier (1,150 kg / 2,535 lb) than the Schlüter Euro Trac 1900 HM8 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 836 RZ” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Euro Trac 1900 HM8. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 32 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 836 RZ” | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1900 HM 8” | DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Renault Ares 836 RZ has 32 forward gears and the Schlüter Euro Trac 1900 HM8 is stepless (CVT) — not called. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Ares 836 RZ and the Euro Trac 1900 HM8. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 836 RZ” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1900 HM 8” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmOECD test report 2109, 2004 | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1900 HM 8” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 836 RZ” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1900 HM 8” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 836 RZ”; OECD test report 2109, 2004 | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1900 HM 8” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2001–2005 | 1992 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Ares 836 RZ is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault Ares 836 RZ is 16% heavier (1,150 kg / 2,535 lb) than the Schlüter Euro Trac 1900 HM8 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Renault Ares 836 RZ is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Transmissions differ in kind: the Renault Ares 836 RZ has 32 forward gears and the Schlüter Euro Trac 1900 HM8 is stepless (CVT) — not called.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Ares 836 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Euro Trac 1900 HM8 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources