Renault 96 or ZETOR 8111/8145?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 96 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8111/8145 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The ZETOR 8111/8145 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 55% (17.3 L/min / 4.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The ZETOR 8111/8145 suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 21% (710 kg / 1,565 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.
- The ZETOR 8111/8145 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 96 | 8111/8145 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 60.4 kW (81.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631” | 60.3 kW (80.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8111/8145” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 96 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8111/8145 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 96 and the 8111/8145. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 96 and the 8111/8145. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 31.3 L/min (8.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631” | 48.6 L/min (12.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8111/8145” | AheadThe ZETOR 8111/8145 has 55% more hydraulic flow (17.3 L/min / 4.6 gpm) than the Renault 96 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,500 kg (5,512 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 8111/8145. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,430 kg (7,562 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631” | 4,140 kg (9,127 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8111/8145” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 8111/8145 is 21% heavier (710 kg / 1,565 lb) than the Renault 96 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 96 and the 8111/8145. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631” | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8111/8145” | AheadThe ZETOR 8111/8145 has 100% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Renault 96 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 96 and the 8111/8145. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8111/8145” | AheadThe ZETOR 8111/8145 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Renault 96 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8111/8145” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 8111/8145. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 96 R7631” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 8111/8145” | AheadThe ZETOR 8111/8145 is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 96 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1969–1972 | 1984–1990 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 8111/8145 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The ZETOR 8111/8145 has 55% more hydraulic flow (17.3 L/min / 4.6 gpm) than the Renault 96 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 8111/8145 is 21% heavier (710 kg / 1,565 lb) than the Renault 96 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 8111/8145 has 100% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Renault 96 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 8111/8145 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Renault 96 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 8111/8145 is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 96 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The ZETOR 8111/8145 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 96 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8111/8145 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources