Renault 891-4 (S) or SOMECA 850 (TD)?

Which should you choose?

The figures split: the SOMECA 850 (TD) is ahead on hydraulic flow; the Renault 891-4 (S) is ahead on three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Renault 891-4 (S) and SOMECA 850 (TD), with the call on each
Question891-4 (S)850 (TD)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?56.7 kW (76.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 891-4 R7684”57.1 kW (76.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 850”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 891-4 (S) and the 850 (TD).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 891-4 (S) and the 850 (TD).
Which pumps more oil for implements?32.6 L/min (8.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 891-4 R7684”38.0 L/min (10.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 850”AheadThe SOMECA 850 (TD) has 17% more hydraulic flow (5.4 L/min / 1.4 gpm) than the Renault 891-4 (S) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,440 kg (7,584 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 891-4 R7684”2,712 kg (5,979 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 850”AheadThe Renault 891-4 (S) has 27% more lift (728 kg / 1,605 lb) than the SOMECA 850 (TD) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?4,740 kg (10,450 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 891-4 R7684”3,195 kg (7,044 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 850”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 891-4 (S) is 48% heavier (1,545 kg / 3,406 lb) than the SOMECA 850 (TD) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 891-4 (S) and the 850 (TD).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 891-4 R7684”12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 850”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 891-4 R7684”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 850 (TD).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 891-4 R7684”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 850”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 891-4 R7684”No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the 850 (TD).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 891-4 (S) and the 850 (TD).
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 891-4 R7684”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 850”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1977–19821969–1975Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 891-4 (S) is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The SOMECA 850 (TD) has 17% more hydraulic flow (5.4 L/min / 1.4 gpm) than the Renault 891-4 (S) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 891-4 (S) has 27% more lift (728 kg / 1,605 lb) than the SOMECA 850 (TD) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 891-4 (S) is 48% heavier (1,545 kg / 3,406 lb) than the SOMECA 850 (TD) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 891-4 (S) is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources