Renault 88 or VOLVO-BM T 600 Boxer?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the VOLVO-BM T 600 Boxer: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on top speed.

  • The VOLVO-BM T 600 Boxer suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 65% (16.0 L/min / 4.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The VOLVO-BM T 600 Boxer suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Renault 88 and VOLVO-BM T 600 Boxer, with the call on each
Question88T 600 BoxerCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?35.9 kW (48.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 88 R7261”36.2 kW (48.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 600 Boxer”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 88 and the T 600 Boxer.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 88 and the T 600 Boxer.
Which pumps more oil for implements?24.5 L/min (6.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 88 R7261”40.5 L/min (10.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 600 Boxer”AheadThe VOLVO-BM T 600 Boxer has 65% more hydraulic flow (16.0 L/min / 4.2 gpm) than the Renault 88 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,000 kg (4,409 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 88 R7261”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the T 600 Boxer.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,040 kg (4,497 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 88 R7261”3,020 kg (6,658 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 600 Boxer”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VOLVO-BM T 600 Boxer is 48% heavier (980 kg / 2,161 lb) than the Renault 88 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 88 and the T 600 Boxer.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 88 R7261”10Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 600 Boxer”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 88 and the T 600 Boxer.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 88 R7261”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 600 Boxer”AheadThe VOLVO-BM T 600 Boxer has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Renault 88 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 88 R7261”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 600 Boxer”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 88 R7261”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the T 600 Boxer.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 88 R7261”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 600 Boxer”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1967–19711967–1970EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The VOLVO-BM T 600 Boxer has 65% more hydraulic flow (16.0 L/min / 4.2 gpm) than the Renault 88 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The VOLVO-BM T 600 Boxer is 48% heavier (980 kg / 2,161 lb) than the Renault 88 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The VOLVO-BM T 600 Boxer has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Renault 88 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources