Renault 851-4 (S) or Renault 851 (S)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Renault 851-4 (S) is ahead on drive.

  • The Renault 851-4 (S) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 14% (420 kg / 926 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Renault 851-4 (S) and Renault 851 (S), with the call on each
Question851-4 (S)851 (S)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?52.5 kW (70.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 851-4 R7664”52.5 kW (70.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 851 R7661”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 851-4 (S) and the 851 (S).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 851-4 (S) and the 851 (S).
Which pumps more oil for implements?33.7 L/min (8.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 851-4 R7664”33.7 L/min (8.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 851 R7661”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,720 kg (8,201 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 851-4 R7664”3,720 kg (8,201 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 851 R7661”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,435 kg (7,573 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 851-4 R7664”3,015 kg (6,647 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 851 R7661”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 851-4 (S) is 14% heavier (420 kg / 926 lb) than the Renault 851 (S) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 851-4 (S) and the 851 (S).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 851-4 R7664”12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 851 R7661”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 851-4 R7664”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 851 (S).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 851-4 R7664”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 851 R7661”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 851-4 R7664”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 851 R7661”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 851-4 (S) and the 851 (S).
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 851-4 R7664”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 851 R7661”AheadThe Renault 851-4 (S) is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 851 (S) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1974–19891974–1989EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault 851-4 (S) is 14% heavier (420 kg / 926 lb) than the Renault 851 (S) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 851-4 (S) is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 851 (S) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources