Renault 80 S/F or Steyr 8065 (a)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 80 S/F has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8065 (a) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Steyr 8065 (a) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 53% (840 kg / 1,852 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 80 S/F | 8065 (a) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 41.2 kW (55.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7386” | 41.2 kW (55.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8065” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 80 S/F has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8065 (a) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 80 S/F and the 8065 (a). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 80 S/F and the 8065 (a). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 26.8 L/min (7.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7386” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 8065 (a). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,640 kg (5,820 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7386” | 2,600 kg (5,732 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8065” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,595 kg (3,516 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7386” | 2,435 kg (5,368 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8065” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Steyr 8065 (a) is 53% heavier (840 kg / 1,852 lb) than the Renault 80 S/F (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 80 S/F and the 8065 (a). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 6 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7386” | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8065” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 80 S/F and the 8065 (a). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7386” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8065” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7386” | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8065” | AheadThe Steyr 8065 (a) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 80 S/F does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7386” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 8065 (a). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 80S R7386” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 8065” | AheadThe Steyr 8065 (a) is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 80 S/F is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1976–1984 | 1986–1992 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Steyr 8065 (a) is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Steyr 8065 (a) is 53% heavier (840 kg / 1,852 lb) than the Renault 80 S/F (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Steyr 8065 (a) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 80 S/F does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Steyr 8065 (a) is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 80 S/F is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Steyr 8065 (a) is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 80 S/F has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8065 (a) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources