Renault 80-14 TX or VOLVO-BM T 700?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Renault 80-14 TX: hydraulic flow and three-point lift. It is also ahead on PTO speeds and drive.
- The Renault 80-14 TX suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
- The Renault 80-14 TX suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 17% (5.9 L/min / 1.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 39% (1,077 kg / 2,374 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Renault 80-14 TX suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 80-14 TX | T 700 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 53.6 kW (71.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-14 TX R7762” | 53.6 kW (71.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 700” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 80-14 TX and the T 700. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 80-14 TX and the T 700. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 41.4 L/min (10.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-14 TX R7762” | 35.5 L/min (9.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 700” | AheadThe Renault 80-14 TX has 17% more hydraulic flow (5.9 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the VOLVO-BM T 700 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,820 kg (8,422 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-14 TX R7762” | 2,743 kg (6,047 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 700” | AheadThe Renault 80-14 TX has 39% more lift (1,077 kg / 2,374 lb) than the VOLVO-BM T 700 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,800 kg (8,378 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-14 TX R7762” | 4,150 kg (9,149 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 700” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 80-14 TX and the T 700. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-14 TX R7762” | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 700” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 80-14 TX and the T 700. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-14 TX R7762” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 700” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-14 TX R7762” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 700” | AheadThe Renault 80-14 TX offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the VOLVO-BM T 700 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 80-14 TX and the T 700. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-14 TX R7762” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 700” | AheadThe Renault 80-14 TX is available with four-wheel drive; the VOLVO-BM T 700 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1984–1987 | 1976–1982 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 80-14 TX is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault 80-14 TX has 17% more hydraulic flow (5.9 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the VOLVO-BM T 700 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 80-14 TX has 39% more lift (1,077 kg / 2,374 lb) than the VOLVO-BM T 700 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 80-14 TX offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the VOLVO-BM T 700 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Renault 80-14 TX is available with four-wheel drive; the VOLVO-BM T 700 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Renault 80-14 TX is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources