Renault 80-14 F or SAME Golden 75 Compatto (SAME)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Renault 80-14 F: hydraulic flow and three-point lift. On features, the SAME Golden 75 Compatto is ahead on top speed and PTO speeds.
- The SAME Golden 75 Compatto suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
- The Renault 80-14 F suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 27% (9.3 L/min / 2.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 126% (1,960 kg / 4,321 lb) more three-point lift.
- The SAME Golden 75 Compatto suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 80-14 F | Golden 75 Compatto | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 49.7 kW (66.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-14 F R3278” | 49.9 kW (66.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 75 Compatto” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 80-14 F and the Golden 75 Compatto. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 80-14 F and the Golden 75 Compatto. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 43.2 L/min (11.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-14 F R3278” | 33.9 L/min (9.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 75 Compatto” | AheadThe Renault 80-14 F has 27% more hydraulic flow (9.3 L/min / 2.5 gpm) than the SAME Golden 75 Compatto (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,510 kg (7,738 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-14 F R3278” | 1,550 kg (3,417 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 75 Compatto” | AheadThe Renault 80-14 F has 126% more lift (1,960 kg / 4,321 lb) than the SAME Golden 75 Compatto (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,130 kg (4,696 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-14 F R3278” | 2,490 kg (5,490 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 75 Compatto” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The SAME Golden 75 Compatto is 17% heavier (360 kg / 794 lb) than the Renault 80-14 F (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 80-14 F and the Golden 75 Compatto. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-14 F R3278” | 16 to 45Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 75 Compatto” | Sources disagreeNo call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the Golden 75 Compatto. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 80-14 F and the Golden 75 Compatto. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-14 F R3278” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 75 Compatto” | AheadThe SAME Golden 75 Compatto has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Renault 80-14 F (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-14 F R3278” | 540/1000 rpmOECD test report 1855, 1999 | AheadThe SAME Golden 75 Compatto offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 80-14 F does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 75 Compatto” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 80-14 F. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 80-14 F R3278” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 75 Compatto”; OECD test report 1855, 1999 | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1986–1999 | 1998–2003 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The SAME Golden 75 Compatto is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault 80-14 F has 27% more hydraulic flow (9.3 L/min / 2.5 gpm) than the SAME Golden 75 Compatto (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 80-14 F has 126% more lift (1,960 kg / 4,321 lb) than the SAME Golden 75 Compatto (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The SAME Golden 75 Compatto is 17% heavier (360 kg / 794 lb) than the Renault 80-14 F (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The SAME Golden 75 Compatto has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Renault 80-14 F (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The SAME Golden 75 Compatto offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 80-14 F does not (as stated by the sources).
- The SAME Golden 75 Compatto is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the Golden 75 Compatto.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources