Renault 75-12 RS or WHITE 2-75?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 75-12 RS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-75 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Renault 75-12 RS suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 75-12 RS | 2-75 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 55.2 kW (74.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-12 RA/RS R7731” | 55.9 kW (75.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-75” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 75-12 RS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-75 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 75-12 RS and the 2-75. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 75-12 RS and the 2-75. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 39.9 L/min (10.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-12 RA/RS R7731” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 2-75. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,680 kg (3,704 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-12 RA/RS R7731” | 2,405 kg (5,302 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-75” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 75-12 RS: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-12 RA/RS R7731”); the 2-75: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-75”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,120 kg (6,878 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-12 RA/RS R7731” | 2,770 kg (6,107 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-75” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 75-12 RS is 13% heavier (350 kg / 772 lb) than the WHITE 2-75 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 75-12 RS and the 2-75. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-12 RA/RS R7731” | 16Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-75” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-75” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 75-12 RS. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-12 RA/RS R7731” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-75” | AheadThe Renault 75-12 RS has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the WHITE 2-75 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-12 RA/RS R7731” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-75” | AheadThe Renault 75-12 RS offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the WHITE 2-75 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-12 RA/RS R7731” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-75” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-12 RA/RS R7731” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-75” | AheadThe WHITE 2-75 is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 75-12 RS is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1984–1987 | 1982–1988 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault 75-12 RS is 13% heavier (350 kg / 772 lb) than the WHITE 2-75 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 75-12 RS has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the WHITE 2-75 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 75-12 RS offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the WHITE 2-75 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The WHITE 2-75 is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 75-12 RS is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 75-12 RS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-75 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 75-12 RS: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-12 RA/RS R7731”); the 2-75: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-75”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources